Comment on Bill's blog.
The tag and confirm portions must be done in approximately the same locations. For example, if I recognize where a picture was taken, I can't just confirm it from my house (unless the picture was taken at my house). I have to go to the place where the picture was taken. The way this works is that the phone you are playing on detects the nearby wireless networks to determine your location.
The makers of Eyespy then conducted a user study with images captured from Eyespy and images pulled from Flickr. Two routes were created through a large public area and users used photos pulled from either Eyespy or Flickr exclusively to try and find their way through the route. The users that used the Eyespy tags were able to identify the locations on the route much faster and with much greater accuracy than those that used the Flickr tags. This could be used to help aid tourists in navigating unfamiliar areas.
I think this is a great way to improve location tags on images, especially if the Eyespy becomes more widespread. It is a very reliable way for getting identifiable images since the ones that are most identifiable will most likely get the highest scores. And the incentive of high scores encourages players to try and snap easily identifiable pictures. I would love to see if this 'human algorithm' (as the authors call it) could be applied to other areas of computer science.
No comments:
Post a Comment